Abstract

Despite recognition that early intervention for first-episode psychosis (FEP) improves outcomes, Black youth with FEP continue to experience critical disparities in care. A historical lack of scientific focus on racial and ethnic factors in the study of psychosis and scant investigations among publicly insured (ie, Medicaid-enrolled) youth hinder our ability to understand and address factors that contribute to disparities in early FEP care. Strategies for improving FEP services for Black youth are reliant on more precise identification of who faces disparities and when during the early course of illness disparities are experienced. A retrospective longitudinal analysis of Ohio Medicaid claims data was performed for 987982 youth aged 15-24 years between 2010 and 2020 to examine: (1) the likelihood of FEP diagnosis, (2) the type of psychotic disorder diagnosis received, and (3) receipt of treatment following psychosis onset. Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) youth, relative to non-Hispanic White (NHW) peers, were more likely to be diagnosed with a psychotic disorder and were further more likely to receive a diagnosis of schizophrenia relative to an affective psychotic disorder. In the first year following FEP diagnosis, NHB youth were also less likely to receive psychotherapy than NHW youth; this disparity was no longer present when examined at 2 years following FEP. In this study, Black youth experienced disparities in both the diagnosis and early treatment of FEP. Additional efforts are needed to understand and address these observed disparities and to promote equitable access to FEP care during the critical early illness phases.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.