Pulse versus non-pulse corticosteroid therapy in patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Abstract

Corticosteroids are commonly used for the treatment of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF); however, the optimal initial dose of corticosteroids remains uncertain due to a lack of sufficient evidence. We evaluated whether the administration of a pulse dose of corticosteroids resulted in improved survival outcomes compared with conventional non-pulse dose of corticosteroids. We retrospectively analysed 238 patients with AE-IPF treated with corticosteroids at a tertiary referral hospital between January 2013 and December 2021. Based on whether a pulse dose of corticosteroids (methylprednisolone of ≥250 mg/day or equivalent) was administered within 7 days of hospitalization for AE-IPF, the patients were divided into the pulse and non-pulse regimen groups. The survival outcomes were compared between the two groups using multivariable regression and propensity score-matched analyses. Among the 238 patients, 59 patients received pulse dose of corticosteroids, whereas 179 patients received conventional non-pulse dose of corticosteroids. After adjusting for the confounding factors related to the baseline clinical and radiographic severity, compared with the conventional non-pulse regimen, the pulse regimen of corticosteroids did not reduce the risk of mortality at the 3-month (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.45-1.38) or 12-month (aHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.60-1.25) follow-ups. Propensity score-matched analysis revealed similar results. The survival outcomes of patients with AE-IPF who received a pulse dose of corticosteroids did not differ from those of patients who received conventional non-pulse dose of corticosteroids. Further prospective studies are required to establish the optimal initial dose of corticosteroids for the treatment of AE-IPF.