Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction Technological advances have led to the proliferation of lung function assessment techniques beyond spirometry in most countries. At the same time, new knowledge of respiratory physiology has allowed an expansion of lung function parameters, requiring an integrated approach to interpreting results. Areas covered This review addresses the major pulmonary function tests (PFTs) used in clinical practice, new concepts regarding reference values, and reformulations of terminology for defining standards of lung function impairment. It highlights the complexities and nuances inherent in the interpretation of PFT parameters, particularly in light of recent updates from the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society. Expert opinion In a new paradigm, PFTs should be used to classify the pathophysiology of treatable traits rather than to diagnose respiratory disease, given the considerable variation in the clinical patterns of PFTs. It is necessary to look not only at lung mechanics but also at lung volume, gas transfer, and small airway involvement to capture as much information as possible. In this context, it is also important to understand that racial/ethnic differences in lung function are not due to biological differences but may reflect socioeconomic status and represent health disparities.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have