Abstract
Objective To compare and analyze the effects of psychological nursing intervention and conventional care on the efficacy in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Methods The clinical data on 92 patients with acute myocardial infarction who had been treated in the emergency department during the period of January 2006 to December 2011.The patients were divided into psychological intervention group and conventional care group.Scores for anxiety and rate of recanalization rate after thrombolytic therapy were compared between the two groups before and after intervention.Results Scores for anxiety did not differ significantly between the two groups before intervention.After intervention,scores for anxiety were markedly lower in were no differences in psychological care group after the intervention anxiety scores were significantly lower in psychological intervention than in conventional care group,and rate of recanalization was significantly higher in psychological intervention group than in conventional care group after thrombolytic therapy.Conclusions Psychological nursing intervention is easier to reduce patient anxiety than conventional care and can improve rate of recanalization by thrombolytic therapy Key words: Psychological nursing intervention; Conventional care; Acute myocardial infarction; Comparative analysis
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
