Abstract

In the present study the author disclosed the role of pronoia in the military organization of the Byzantine Empire at early Palaeologian period. The concrete cases of the award allow recognizing the proniarety as the Byzantine military institution dealing exclusively with the military leadership. The grant of pronoia was a replacement for traditional rewards of military commanders of noble origin. However, in some cases it was identified that compulsory military service was a function of power which was granted to the proniares in addition to the tax quota. Holders of pronoia were not only the Romans military commanders but also the mercenaries. Such awards could reduce the costs of imperial treasury for direct payments. In the case of proniares-Byzantines, depending on posotis, we can talk about the conferring upon pronoia the representatives of various levels of the military leadership. The pronoias granted as a reward or the compensation for losses incurred as a result of the performance of official engagements, could be transferred to the commanders of low levels which were recruited from among stratiotes (obviously, dekarhes). Definition of the role of pronoia in military practice of the early palaeologian period which would be possible in the identification of the proportion of pronoiares and strateia contingents and the correlation of victories and defeats, won by them, is impossible in practice.

Highlights

  • In the present study the author disclosed the role of pronoia in the military organization of the Byzantine Empire at early Palaeologian period

  • The grant of pronoia was a replacement for traditional rewards of military commanders of noble origin

  • In some cases it was identified that compulsory military service was a function of power which was granted to the proniares in addition to the tax quota

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The grant of pronoia was a replacement for traditional rewards of military commanders of noble origin. Что в рамках мероприятий Ходина акритские отряды были укомплектованы крестьянами, получавшими доход с земельных участков, переданных им для возделывания на условии несения воинской службы 3. Что подчеркнутый Пахимером статус акритских участков выражал сущность привилегии пограничников и может быть признан как классифицирующий социальный признак. В этой связи можно предположить, что перевод земель из состояния «неизвестных казне» в казенные, обложенные налогами, определил перевод держателей участков из акритов-элефтеров в крестьян 4.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.