Abstract

In order to achieve target greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, such as those proposed by each country by nationally determined contributions (NDCs), GHG emission projections are receiving attention around the world. Generally, integrated assessment models (IAMs) are used to estimate future GHG emissions considering both economic structure and final energy consumption. However, these models usually do not consider the entire supply chain, because of differences in the aims of application. In contrast, life cycle assessment (LCA) considers the entire supply chain but does not cover future environmental impacts. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the national carbon footprint projection in Japan based on life cycle thinking and IAMs, using the advantages of each. A future input–output table was developed using the Asia-Pacific integrated model (AIM)/computable general equilibrium (CGE) model (Japan) developed by the National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES). In this study, we collected the fundamental data using LCA databases and estimated future GHG emissions based on production-based and consumption-based approaches considering supply chains among industrial sectors. We targeted fiscal year (FY) 2030 because the Japanese government set a goal for GHG emissions in 2030 in its NDC report. Accordingly, we set three scenarios: FY2005 (business as usual (BAU)), FY2030 (BAU), and FY2030 (NDC). As a result, the carbon footprint (CFP) in FY2030 will be approximately 1097 megatons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO₂eq), which is 28.5% lower than in FY2005. The main driver of this reduction is a shift in energy use, such as the introduction of renewable energy. According to the results, the CFP from the consumption side, fuel combustion in the use stage, transport and postal services, and electricity influence the total CFP, while results of the production side showed the CFP of the energy and material sectors, such as iron and steel and transport, will have an impact on the total CFP. Moreover, carbon productivity will gradually increase and FY2030 (NDC) carbon productivity will be higher than the other two cases.

Highlights

  • Following the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) special report on global warming of 1.5 ◦C published in 2018 [1], evaluation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has received more attention around the world

  • Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a method to quantitatively assess the environmental impacts of products and services “from cradle to grave,” that is, the entire supply chain

  • By comparison to total GHG emissions, which will be reduced by 25.4% in the nationally determined contributions (NDCs) scenario, the carbon footprint (CFP) in FY2030 (BAU) will not achieve that goal

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Following the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) special report on global warming of 1.5 ◦C published in 2018 [1], evaluation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has received more attention around the world. Estimation of environmental burden projections based on socioeconomic parameters such as shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) is becoming important. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a method to quantitatively assess the environmental impacts of products and services “from cradle to grave,” that is, the entire supply chain. The scope is extended to a variety of directions for assessment of organizations and analysis of consumer consumption patterns and lifestyles at a national or international level [2]. LCA at the national level has received attention as applied to environmental policyIn-mpaakritnicgu. Tnahlactocnaslucumlapttiioonn, museitnhgodthwe ams ublatsi-erdegoinoninalpiuntp–uout–topuuttpaunta(lMysRisIO(IO) tAa)b,lewEhXicIhOcBaAnSbEe 2u.s1e.dTthoaat ncaallycuzelabtiootnh mpreotdhuocdtiwona-s bbaasseeddaonnd icnopnustu–moupttpiount-banasaelydsaispp(IrOoaAc)h, ews.hich can be used to analyze both production-based and consIunmthpetiopnro-bdauscetdioanp-bparoseadchaepsp. Roach, environmental burden is classified from the production side, such Ians tmheanpurfoadcutucrtieorns-abnadseedleacptrpircopaochw,eerncvoimropnamneienst.aOl bnutrhdeenotihsecrlahsasnifide,dinfrtohme ctohnespurmodputicotnio-nbassiedde, aspupchroaaschm, aennuvfiraocntumreernstaalnbduerldeecntriics aplolowceartecdomacpcoanrdieins.gOtontthheefointhalerprhoadnudc,tisntothbeeccoonnssuummpetdio, nsu-bcahsaeds baypphroouacsheh, oenldvsi.roGnmeneenratalllyb, uirndeenviasluaalltoincagtetdheacceonrvdirinongmtoenthtaelfifnoaoltpprroindtu, ctthsetocboenscuomnsputmioend-b, assuecdh aapspbryoahcohuissechhoolsdesn. Tnahlactocnaslucumlapttiioonn, museitnhgodthwe ams ublatsi-erdegoinoninalpiuntp–uout–topuuttpaunta(lMysRisIO(IO) tAa)b,lewEhXicIhOcBaAnSbEe 2u.s1e.dTthoaat ncaallycuzelabtiootnh mpreotdhuocdtiwona-s bbaasseeddaonnd icnopnustu–moupttpiount-banasaelydsaispp(IrOoaAc)h, ews.hich can be used to analyze both production-based and consIunmthpetiopnro-bdauscetdioanp-bparoseadchaepsp. roach, environmental burden is classified from the production side, such Ians tmheanpurfoadcutucrtieorns-abnadseedleacptrpircopaochw,eerncvoimropnamneienst.aOl bnutrhdeenotihsecrlahsasnifide,dinfrtohme ctohnespurmodputicotnio-nbassiedde, aspupchroaaschm, aennuvfiraocntumreernstaalnbduerldeecntriics aplolowceartecdomacpcoanrdieins.gOtontthheefointhalerprhoadnudc,tisntothbeeccoonnssuummpetdio, nsu-bcahsaeds baypphroouacsheh, oenldvsi.roGnmeneenratalllyb, uirndeenviasluaalltoincagtetdheacceonrvdirinongmtoenthtaelfifnoaoltpprroindtu, ctthsetocboenscuomnsputmioend-b, assuecdh aapspbryoahcohuissechhoolsdesn. bGeceanuesrealtlhye, itnotaevl daleumatainndg wthietheinnvairnoantimonenctaanlnfootobtpersiantti,sftiheed coonnlysuwmitphtidoonm-beassteicd ianpdpursotaricehs.isInchaodsdenitiboenc,atuhseesethreetsoutlatls dceomntarnibduwteitthoinpraonmaotitoinngcatnhneopt ubrecshaatsiesfioefdloonwlyewnvitihrodnommeensttailc iimndpuacsttrpierso.dIunctasd. dTihteiornef,otrhee, stehereesnuvltisrocnomnternibtaultefotootpprrionmt iosticnaglctuhleatpedurfcohlaloswe ionfglothwe ecnovnisruomnmpteinonta-l bimaspeadcat ppprordoaucchtsc. oTnhseirdeefroirneg, tthheeeennvtiirroensmupepnltyalcfhoaoitnprininvtoilsvcianlgcufolarteeidgnfotlrlaodwei.nSgotmheecgoonvseurmnmpteionnts-bhaasveed baepepnrofoalclohwcoinngsitdheirsianpgptrhoeaecnht,isruecshupasptlhyecBhariitnisihnvgoolvveirnngmfoenreti,gwnhtircahdhe.asSopmubeligsohveedrnthmee“nUtsKh’saCvearbbeoenn Ffoololtopwriinntg” trheipsoarpt p[4r]oianchr,ecseuncthyaesartsh.eInBrtihtiisshregpoovret,rnthmeecnatr,bwonhifcohothparsinptu(CblFisPh)eids dthiveid“UedKi’nstCo atrhbroeen cFaoteogtporriinest:”GreHpGorste[m4]binedrdeecdenitnyiemarpso.rItnedthgiosordeps oarntd, thseervcaicrebso,nGfHooGtsprfirnotm(CUFKP-)pirsoddiuvcidededgionotdosthanrede sceartveigcoersiceos:nGsuHmGesdebmybUeKddreedsidinenimtsp, aonrtdedGgHoGosdsgeannedrasteerdvidcierse,cGtlHy Gbys UfrKomhoUuKse-phroolddsu.ced goods and serviFcoelslocwoninsugmtheed sbcyopUeKorfetshideesntutsd, ya,ntdheGrHe aGrsegseenveerraatlemd edtihroecdtslytobydeUteKrmhoinuesethhoeldcasr. bon footprint, whichFoalrleowsuinmgmthaeriszceodpienoFf itghuersetu1.dyA,sthsehroewanreisnevtheirsalfimguerthe,otdhsetoindpeutte–romuitnpeutthbeacsaerdboanppforooatpchrinist, uwshuiaclhlyarcehosusemnmwahrieznedcoinnsFiidgeurrieng1.lAarsgsehroswcanleisnstuhcishfiagsunrea,titohneainl porutg–looubtapl.uTt hbaesmedualtpi-prreogaicohnaisl uinspuualtl–y ocuhtopsuetn(MwhReInO)cotanbslied,efroirnegxlaamrgpelre,scwaalesscshuocshenastoneasttiiomnaatleotrhgelobbuardl.eTnhceaumsuedltib-ryeigmiopnoarltsinapnudt–eoxuptoprutst a(nMdRItOo )ctoanbdleu,cftoraecxoammpprleeh, wenassivcehoesveanlutoateiostnimoaftethtehesubuprpdlyencchaauinsewd ibtyh icmopnosirdtseraantdioenxpofortthseanfidnatol dceomndauncdt[a5]c.oAmnpLrCehAendsaitvaebaesvea,lEumatiboondoiefdthEenseurgpypalyndchEaminiswsiiothn cInotnesnidsietyraDtiaotna ofofrthJaepfiannaUl sdienmg aInnpdu[t5–]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call