Abstract
ABSTRACT The prevailing perspective on migrant organisations emphasises their positive contributions and role in the lives of migrants from various countries worldwide. Drawing on Bourdieu’s field theory and the ‘community of unbelonging’ framework, the article presents a contrasting view that reveals the limitations of the celebratory understanding of migration organisations, their activities and representative function for ‘migrant community’ members. Based on ethnographic research in Australia, I show how Russian-speaking migrant institutions, due to their involvement in competitive struggles and the pro-Kremlin ideological network, can restrict public forms of community participation, the expression of collective memory, and civic practices employed within the migrant community. I demonstrate how Russia, aiming to implement its political and ideological goals and instrumentalise the diaspora, has established or supported a specific migrant institution: ‘migrant quasi-non-governmental organisations.’ Different migrant groups become involved in the Russian ideological compatriots project through these migrant quasi-NGOs, mediating Russia’s strategies to extend political and cultural influence. The dynamic processes in the field are influenced by the Russian-Ukrainian war and the emergence of new players wishing to act as cultural producers, and this shift of dominant forces impacts the production of community activities.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call