Abstract

The author’s interpretation of the content and essence of ideological and political discussions in the Russian post-October emigration in years 1920-1930 about the causes of the revolutionary collapse of Russia, the ways and prospects of the revival of the national Russian statehood has been presented. The connection between the ideological search for Russian emigration and the central for Russian social thought, the problem of understanding the originality of the Russian political process, the features of the formation and evolution of national political identity, has been substantiated. The reasons for the widespread anti-democratic views and beliefs in the emigrant environment, the growing distrust of Western democracy and liberal institutions and values have been revealed. An analysis of the political projects and models of the future revived Russia proposed by Russian emigrants («social Christianity», a renewed monarchy), which affirmed the special path of development of Russia that distinguished its «philistine» West, – has been given. The conclusion about the importance of these projects of the ideal structure of the future of Russia for the modern state development of Russia, the search for its new identity, has been made.

Highlights

  • An analysis of the political projects and models of the future revived Russia proposed by Russian emigrants

  • which affirmed the special path of development of Russia that distinguished its «philistine» West

  • По мысли автора, следует искать и самую большую опасность для республики, ибо «рационалистическая концепция республики, как удобная форма демократии, делает ее идеологически слабой в столкновении с мистикой монархической власти»

Read more

Summary

Introduction

П. Федотова, русскую революцию следует рассматривать, прежде всего, как «социальную революцию», неизбежность которой была предопределена всем ходом политического развития России [20, c.127]. Политическое бесправие образованных классов в дореволюционной России сформировало у русской интеллигенции устойчивую психологию государственного отщепенчества и безнациональности – единственный, по замечанию Струве, в мировой истории «случай забвения национальной идеи мозгом нации» [7, с.176]. В этой ситуации только идея царя оставалась, по мысли автора статьи, единственной «скрепой» нации, сохранявшей относительную устойчивость исторической России.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call