Abstract
The fragmentation of legal regimes in the world society rejects the consideration of legitimacy in terms of the hierarchy of norms or courts, and promotes the reflexion on a weak normative compatibility which enables a coordination between legal fragments and its socially-coupled operative fields. As legitimatory candidates to confront this problem, discursive rationality, procedimental legitimacy, the self-constitutionality of regimes and the concept of justice as the contingency formula of law are discussed. The latter appears as a privileged mechanism of legitimation —a key element in promoting a self-transcendence of law and the observation of derivatives of legitimacy in non-legal fields.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
