Abstract
Mental disorders are significant contributors to the global burden of disease (1). While they occur across all levels of socio-economic status, the majority of populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) do not have access to effective psychological and pharmacological interventions (2). Key barriers to sustainable delivery of psychological therapies in LMICs include limited mental health funding and infrastructure, chronic shortage of mental health professionals, lack of treatments adapted to the local context, and challenges associated with training and supervision. Implementation of low-intensity psychological interventions by trained para-professionals is one potential solution to this problem (3,4) which is receiving significant attention as part of global mental health research agendas (e.g.,(5)). A number of low-intensity interventions have demonstrated clinical benefit and utility in high-income settings. For example, early analyses of the UK’s Improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme (IAPT,(6)) found a substantial reduction in depression and anxiety in people who attended at least two sessions of low-intensity interventions. Additionally, a recent meta-analysis challenged conventional thinking and provided support for low-intensity interventions as an effective treatment even for individuals with symptoms of severe depression (7). Evidence for the applicability of psychological interventions by non-specialists in LMICs is mounting (8,9). For instance, group interpersonal psychotherapy facilitated by local para-professionals has been shown to be effective in rural Uganda among depressed adults compared to usual care at six month follow-up (10). In rural Pakistan, Rahman et al (11) found that local community health workers could effectively deliver a locally adapted cognitive-behavioural intervention for perinatal depression. Mothers receiving the treatment demonstrated significant clinical improvement on depression symptoms, showed less disability and better overall and social functioning. Finally, a comparatively more intensive transdiagnostic intervention, the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA), has shown promising results for the treatment of symptoms of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress in Burmese refugees when delivered by para-professionals (12). To fill the gap between mental health needs and access to quality care, and extend the current research on low-intensity interventions in LMICs, the World Health Organization (WHO) – as part of its Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) – has begun to develop and test low-intensity psychological interventions. The current paper focuses on one such intervention, named Problem Management Plus (PM+).
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have