Abstract
Our contribution to the debate about hate speech, Pressure Valves and Bloodied Chickens analyzes a group of objections to hate-speech regulation that originate from the liberal side and take the form of asserting that if minorities knew their own best interest they would not demand rules limiting hate speech. Paternalistic in nature, these objections have in common that the objector pretends to knows better what is in minorities' best interest and include the best-friend and reverse-enforcement argument that hate-speech rules are invariably turned against minorities when, in fact, they are not.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
