Precursors of typical nitrogenous disinfection byproducts: Characteristics, removal, and toxicity formation potential

Abstract

The emergence of nitrogenous disinfection byproducts (N-DBPs) in drinking water has become a widespread concern. In this study, dichloroacetonitrile (DCAN), dicholoacetamide (DCAcAm) and trichloronitromethane (TCNM) were chosen as representatives to clarify the characteristics of N-DBP precursors in the raw waters of Taihu Lake, the Yangtze River, and Gaoyou Lake. Removal of DCAN and DCAcAm precursors must focus on nonpolar and positively charged organics, but more attention should be paid to micromolecular, polar and non-positively charged organics as TCNM precursors. Compared to molecular weight (MW) and hydrophilicity fractionation, polarity and electrical classification have higher selectivity to intercept N-DBP precursors. The properties of N-DBP precursors are relatively fixed and traceable in water systems, which could contribute to their targeted removal. Based on investigation of their characteristics, the removal efficiency and preferences of organic precursors under different processes were studied in three drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs). The TCNM precursors produced in preozonation can be effectively removed during coagulation. The cumulative removal efficiency of conventional processes on N-DBP precursors was approximately 20–30%, but O3/BAC process improved removal by about 40%. The key to improving the removal efficiency of N-DBP precursors by O3/BAC is that it can significantly remove low-MW, nonpolar, positively charged, hydrophilic and transphilic organics. In combined toxicity trials, both cytotoxicity and genotoxicity showed a synergistic effect when DCAN, DCAcAm, and TCNM coexisted, which means that low-level toxicity enhancement in the actual water merits attention. DCAN precursors dominated in the toxicity formation potential (TFP), followed by TCNM precursors. In addition, the removal rate of total N-DBP precursors may be higher than that of TFP, leading to overly optimistic evaluation of precursor removal in water treatment practice. Therefore, the removal effect on TFP must also be considered.