Abstract

South Asia is a region uniquely vulnerable to climate-related impacts. Climate change adaptation in India and Bangladesh evolves using powering and puzzling approaches by policy actors. We seek to answer the question: how do powering and puzzling approaches influence the climate change adaptation policy design and implementation processes in Bangladesh and India? We adopted two strategies to collect and analyze data: semi-structured interviews and discourse analysis. We found that adaptation policymaking is largely top-down, amenable to techno-managerial solutions, and not inclusive of marginalized actors. In Bangladesh, power interplays among ministerial agencies impair the policy implementation process and undermine the success of puzzling. Local-scale agencies do not have enough authority or power to influence the overall implementation processes occurring at higher scales of governance. The powering of different actors in Bangladesh is visible through a duality of mandates and a lack of integration of climate adaptation strategies in different government ministries. The powering aspect of India’s various adaptation policies is the lack of collective puzzling around the question of differentiated vulnerability by axes of social difference. Paradoxically, India has a puzzling approach of hiding behind the poor in international negotiations. Moving forward, both countries should strive to have more inclusive and equitable adaptation policymaking processes that enable the participation of marginalized populations and represent their anxieties and aspirations. Identifying policy-relevant insights from South Asia using the powering and puzzling approaches can foster adaptation policy processes that facilitate empowerment, the missing piece of the adaptation policymaking puzzle.

Highlights

  • Climate change adaptation is an increasingly politicized and contested policy topic in countries such as Bangladesh and India (Jaeger and Michaelowa 2016; Nightingale 2017; Sovacool 2018)

  • Within the adaptation policy domain, problem-framing tends to be dominated by elite groups and solutions offered are often techno-managerial and not contextual (O’Brien et al 2007; Ribot 2014). These trends are especially prevalent in South Asia (Nightingale 2017). It is within this context that this article seeks to answer the following research question: To what effect have powering and puzzling approaches influenced climate change adaptation policy design and implementation processes at the national and sub-national scales in Bangladesh and India? In this article, we argue that adaptation policymaking occurs with a mix of powering and puzzling approaches, is largely top-down, is amenable to techno-managerial solutions, and is not inclusive of marginalized actors

  • Adaptation policymaking in Bangladesh and India occurs through puzzling and powering approaches

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate change adaptation is an increasingly politicized and contested policy topic in countries such as Bangladesh and India (Jaeger and Michaelowa 2016; Nightingale 2017; Sovacool 2018). The framing of problems and adaptation solutions is among the most contested aspects of climate change policymaking (Vij et al 2018; Rashid 2011; Ribot 2014). In these complex political realms, adaptation framing and solutions evolve using both powering and puzzling modalities. Policymaking processes on climate change adaptation transpire using a mix of powering and puzzling

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call