Abstract

This work aims to model the combined cycle power plant (CCPP) using different algorithms. The algorithms used are Ridge, Linear regressor (LR), and upport vector regressor (SVR). The CCPP energy output data collected as a factor of thermal input variables, mainly exhaust vacuum, ambient temperature, relative humidity, and ambient pressure. Initially, the Ridge algorithm-based modeling is performed in detail, and then SVR-based LR, named as SVR (LR), SVR-based radial basis function—SVR (RBF), and SVR-based polynomial regression—SVR (Poly.) algorithms, are applied. Mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared (R2), median absolute error (MeAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and mean Poisson deviance (MPD) are assessed after their training and testing of each algorithm. From the modeling of energy output data, it is seen that SVR (RBF) is the most suitable in providing very close predictions compared to other algorithms. SVR (RBF) training R2 obtained is 0.98 while all others were 0.9–0.92. The testing predictions made by SVR (RBF), Ridge, and RidgeCV are nearly the same, i.e., R2 is 0.92. It is concluded that these algorithms are suitable for predicting sensitive output energy data of a CCPP depending on thermal input variables.

Highlights

  • It should be noted that the regression Ridge is analyzed in detail, and RidgeCV (Ridge cross-validated) model is used only in the last part of this section

  • Affected by VE, ABT, REH, and ABP. These readings of cycle power plants (CCPP) were recorded experimentally, and the entire data set is openly available in the UCI machine learning repository made available by the work reported in [50]

  • The training of the Ridge regressor indicates that the obtained output from the algorithm conveniently matches the experimental readings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Power plants are established on a large scale to provide the needed amount of electricity. In thermal power plants generally, thermodynamical methods are used to analyze the systems accurately for their operation. This method uses many assumptions and parameters to solve thousands of nonlinear equations; its elucidation takes too much effort and computational time. It is not easy to solve these equations without these assumptions [1,2]. To eradicate this barrier, machine learning (ML) methods are common substitutes for thermodynamical methods and mathematical modeling to study random output and input patterns [1].

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.