Abstract
In order to monitor the performance and related efficiency of a combined cycle power plant (CCPP), in addition to the best utilization of its power output, it is vital to predict its full load electrical power output. In this paper, the full load electrical power output of CCPP was predicted employing practically efficient machine learning algorithms, including linear regression, ridge regression, lasso regression, elastic net regression, random forest regression, and gradient boost regression. The original data came from an actual confidential power plant, which was working on a full load for 6 years, with four major features: ambient temperature, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure, and exhaust vacuum, and one target (electrical power output per hour). Different regression performance measures were used, including R2 (coefficient of determination), MAE (Mean Absolute Error), MSE (Mean Squared Error), RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error), and MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error). Research results revealed that the gradient boost regression model outperformed other models with and without using the dimensionality reduction technique (PCA) with the highest R2 of 0.912 and 0.872, respectively, and had the lowest MAPE of 0.872 % and 1.039 %, respectively. Moreover, prediction performance dropped slightly after using the dimensionality reduction technique almost in all regression algorithms used. The novelty in this work is summarized in predicting electrical power output in a CCPP based on a few features using simpler algorithms than reported deep learning and neural networks algorithms combined. That means a lower cost and less complicated procedure as per each, however, resulting in practically accepted results according to the evaluation metrics used.
Highlights
There are many reasons why combined cycles are more and more popular and being taken under consideration as one of the main types of power plants
That means a lower cost and less complicated procedure as per each, resulting in practically accepted results according to the evaluation metrics used
Came from a real confidential power plant, which was working on a full load for 6 years, we used machine learning models to predict cycle power plants (CCPP) full load electrical power output per hour depending on four main features (AT, RH, V, and AP)
Summary
There are many reasons why combined cycles are more and more popular and being taken under consideration as one of the main types of power plants. Combined cycle power plants (CCPP) can perform more efficiently than traditional power plants by about 60 % [1]. A CCPP uses both a gas and a steam turbine together to produce up to 50 % more electricity from the same fuel than a traditional simple-cycle plant. The waste heat from the gas turbine is routed to the nearby steam turbine, which generates extra power [2]. The gas turbine compresses air and mixes it with fuel that is heated to a very high temperature. The hot air-fuel mixture moves through the gas turbine that drives an electricity generator. A heat recovery steam generator creates steam from the gas turbine exhaust heat and delivers it to the steam turbine that sends its energy to a generator where it is converted into additional electricity power output
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.