Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the development program of Tlogoadi Sleman village which is related to social capital and community participation. Social capital as the potential of natural resources and human resources, while community participation is the activity of individuals or groups in village development programs. The research subjects consisted of 12 hamlet heads in Tlogoadi village, and data collection using questionnaire methods and in-depth interviews. Data analysis was descriptive quantitative and qualitative. The results showed that the average social capital of 80% supports the development activities of the village of Tlogoadi and 85% involves community participation. Evaluation based on the utilization of resource potential carried out by Tlogoadi village shows that 75% of the potential of natural resources and human resources are used in rural development which can reduce poverty. Future studies need to be tested on community members from each hamlet to find out the consistency of the results.
Highlights
The purpose of development is to improve the welfare of the community or reduce poverty, and development must always be realized by the community as well
The level of community participation and social capital can be seen from the level of optimizing the use of potential in the village including the potential of natural resources and the potential of human resources because it can lead to uneven results of village development
Social capital is the capital given in each hamlet in the village of Tlogoadi, Mlati District, Sleman, which can be used as an asset in village development. social capital can manifest the potential that exists around the village both from natural resources and human resources
Summary
The purpose of development is to improve the welfare of the community or reduce poverty, and development must always be realized by the community as well. The potential of natural resources and human resources that are optimized as social capital for village development. Studies (Maluccio J, L Haddah, & J May, 2000) prove that social capital is closely related to welfare, poverty reduction or reducing the likelihood of becoming poor in a South African country (Grootaert C, Oh, & Swamy, Social capital household and poverty in Burkina faso, 2002) as well as a study (Grootaert, 2001) that shows social capital influences welfare in Bolivia (Grootaert C & Narayan D, Local Institutions, Poverty and Household Welfare in Bolivia, 2000) in Nigeria and Roslan Social capital is very important for poverty in developing countries and seeks to increase the education of the poor because job creation will not succeed in reducing poverty
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call