Abstract
This article is devoted to the science place problem study in culture, its relationship with other sociocultural phenomena. The purpose of the article is to identify the post-non-classical science relationship specifics with such a phenomenon of modern culture as design. The identification of this specificity can serve as an argument that testifies to the rootedness of post-non-classical science in modern culture. To achieve this goal, the authors set the following tasks: 1) analysis of the science sociocultural determination levels and types; 2) the disclosure of the post-non-classical science and modern design features; 3) the identification of the correlation between them. The authors proceed from the idea of synchronism or parallelism as a form of interaction of sociocultural phenomena and processes. A comparative analysis of the post-non-classical science and modern design main characteristics reveals their common features. The authors associate the existence of these correlations with the sociocultural, worldview influence of postmodernism. The obtained result confirms the idea of the post-non-classical science rootedness in modern culture.
Highlights
The relevance of addressing the problem of the science place in culture, its relationships with other sociocultural phenomena is associated with a certain specificity of modern scientific knowledge
The identification of this specificity can serve as an argument that testifies to the rootedness of post-non-classical science in modern culture
We do not set the task of considering the problem of the sociocultural determination of science in all its breadth
Summary
The relevance of addressing the problem of the science place in culture, its relationships with other sociocultural phenomena is associated with a certain specificity of modern scientific knowledge. It should be noted that under the influence of the specialization extremely increased in the XX-XXI century, on the one hand, the science abstractness and mathematization, on the other hand, an illusion about its autonomy with respect to culture, various forms of spiritual activities such as philosophy, art, religion. Such criticism, brought to anti-scientism, in its radicalism threatens with the scientific rationality destruction as such, that is, the destruction of an important part of the European civilization and culture foundation. Brought to anti-scientism, in its radicalism threatens with the scientific rationality destruction as such, that is, the destruction of an important part of the European civilization and culture foundation The presence of such opposing positions in the interpretation of the relationship between science and culture determines the relevance of further research on this issue
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
