Posterior partial crowns out of lithium disilicate (LS2) with or without posts: A randomized controlled prospective clinical trial with a 3-year follow up

Abstract

ObjectivesThe objective of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the influence of use of posts as well as the type of posterior tooth (premolars vs molars) for the treatment with lithium disilicate (LS2) partial crowns. Materials and methodsA total of 60 patients were treated with posterior LS2 partial crowns. Two groups (n = 60) were made based on the type of restored tooth: Group 1, premolars and Group 2, molars. The samples of each group were divided into 2 subgroups (n = 30): Subgroup A restored with fiber posts and Subgroup B without them. Clinical and intraoral radiographic examinations were assessed during each recall (6 months and, 1, 2, and 3 years). Kaplan-Meier log-rank test and Cox regression analysis (Pp < 0.05) were applied. ResultsThree subgroups showed 100% of survival while group 2 A exhibited the lowest performance (93.3%). The Cox regression analysis showed that the presence of the post was not a significant factor for survival time (Hazard Ratio HR = 0388; CI95% Confidence Interval for H R = 0,1- to 1,5; pp = 017).Tooth type had an influence on survival time that was at the limit of statistical significance (Hazard Ratio HR = 0123; CI95% Confidence Interval for HR = 0 0015- to 0997; p = 005). Particularly, failure risk was greater for premolars. ‘Post by tooth type’ interactions were not statistically significant (p = 0126). Conclusionsover a 3-year observation period, the clinical performance of endodontically treated teeth restored with lithium disilicate partial crowns was not significantly affected by the use of a fiber post and by the type of tooth (premolars or molars).