Abstract
IntroductionA framework for understanding the interrelationship of individual and environmental factors that influence adolescent health and well-being, as well as opportunities for policy-level interventions, is known as Positive Youth Development (PYD). The current study represents one of the largest studies of Croatian adolescents to date, and aimed to examine associations between school and family factors linked to PYD, and mental health outcomes experienced by Croatian youth.MethodsA multi-site survey study was conducted among adolescents (N = 9,655) residing in the five most populous cities in Croatia, with the aim of examining cross-sectional associations of family and school factors with adolescent mental health. The mean age of participants was 16.3 years (SD = 1.2), and 52.5% of participants were female. School and family factors included school attachment, school commitment, family communication, and family satisfaction. Depression, anxiety, and stress were assessed as outcomes. Multigroup structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine relations of interest among female and male adolescents.ResultsAmong school factors, increased school attachment was found to be significantly associated with reduced depression, anxiety, and stress for female adolescents, and with decreased depression and stress for male adolescents. Increased school commitment was significantly associated with decreased depression and anxiety for female adolescents; conversely, an increase in school commitment was associated with an increase in anxiety and stress for male adolescents. Increases in family communication were significantly associated with reduced depression, anxiety, and stress only for male adolescents, while increased family satisfaction was significantly associated with reduced depression, anxiety, and stress for female adolescents and with decreased depression and stress for male adolescents.ConclusionFindings suggest that interventions for mental health promotion and prevention of internalizing problems should address both school and family contexts, and may be more effective when accounting for differing developmental experiences of female and male adolescents.
Highlights
A framework for understanding the interrelationship of individual and environmental factors that influence adolescent health and well-being, as well as opportunities for policy-level interventions, is known as Positive Youth Development (PYD)
Studies have shown that around half of mental health problems start by middle adolescence while 75% of adult mental health issues start before the age of 24 (Kessler et al, 2007; Jones, 2013)
The initial confirmatory factor model was adequately fitting; substantially improved fit was achieved by permitting covariances and residual covariances among several scale variables to be freely estimated (RMSEA = 0.04; probability root-meansquare error of approximation (RMSEA) < 0.05 = 1.00; SRMR = 0.03; comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.95; Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) = 0.95; ( χ2) p-value < 0.001; reduction in Bayesian information criterion (BIC) value = 11032.20)
Summary
A framework for understanding the interrelationship of individual and environmental factors that influence adolescent health and well-being, as well as opportunities for policy-level interventions, is known as Positive Youth Development (PYD). A framework for understanding the interrelationship of individual and environmental factors that influence adolescent health and well-being, as well as opportunities for policy-level interventions, is known as Positive Youth Development (PYD; Lerner et al, 2005, 2013; Benson et al, 2006, 2011; Shek et al, 2019; Wiium and Dimitrova, 2019). One of the basic models of PYD is the Five Cs Model (Lerner et al, 2005), which articulates five factors central to healthy development in adolescence: competence, confidence, character, connection, and caring
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have