Abstract

Com base na discussao acumulada no campo do curriculo sobre organizacao do curriculo escolar, reflito, neste artigo, sobre a disciplinarizacao do conhecimento que nos constitui como pesquisadores. Por que ainda somos tao disciplinares? Mesmo em um campo no qual o debate critico sobre as disciplinas e tao acentuado, por que ainda organizamos nossos periodicos, congressos, processos de avaliacao nas agencias de fomento e aulas de maneira disciplinar? Analiso neste artigo que a resposta a essas questoes nao e encontrada nas dinâmicas gerais da organizacao do conhecimento cientifico, nem pode ser reduzida a dicotomia entre ser contra ou a favor das disciplinas. Defendo como a discussao sobre as disciplinas nos dirige a um debate sobre politica e identidade. Palavras-chave Curriculo; Disciplina; Hibridismo; Identidade; Politica Abstract Based on the accumulation of discussion in the field of the curriculum regarding the school curricular organization itself, I am reflecting in this paper on the disciplinarization of the knowledge that constitutes us as researchers. Why are we still so disciplined in the actual organization of our research? Even in a field where critical debate on the subjects is so strong, why do we still organize our journals, congresses, development agency evaluation processes and classes in such a disciplinary way? I analyze in this paper that the answer to these questions is not found in a general dynamics of organizing scientific knowledge, nor can it be reduced to a dichotomy between being for or against the disciplines. I argue how the discussion on disciplines reminds us of a debate on politics and identities. Keywords Curriculum; Discipline; Hybridism; Identity; Politics

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call