Pollination ecology of the pre-Pyrenean endemic Petrocoptis montsicciana (Caryophyllaceae): effects of population size

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Petrocoptis montsicciana (Caryophyllaceae) is a threatened pre-Pyrenean endemic that grows exclusively on caves and walls of limestone. We studied its pollination ecology by monitoring phenology and by evaluating pollen and nectar production, pollinator activity (frequency and behaviour of visitors), quantity and quality of pollination services, pollen/ovule ratio, and seed set in response to insect exclusion and self-compatibility tests. We also analysed the effect of population size on reproductive mechanisms by comparing a large and a small population. Flowers of P. montsicciana produced nectar and were visited by Hymenoptera (79.7%), Diptera (11.5%), and Lepidoptera (8.8%). The most frequent pollinators (60.6% of total visits) were long-tongued bees of the genus Anthophora. Both populations had a similar range of pollinators. We found a correlation between the number of visited flowers and the number of open flowers per census; 88.7% of pollen grains deposited on the stigmas were conspecific and the main competitor was another chasmophyte plant, Antirrhinum molle. Bagged flowers set seeds but significantly less so than hand-self-pollinated and control flowers. Thus, although self-compatible and self-pollinated, entomophilous pollination of P. montsicciana is required in order to explain c. 10–40% of total seed set, in accordance with P/O ratio estimations. Bagged flowers from the small population set significantly more seeds than the large one. Visitation rates were lower in the small population, but, unexpectedly, showed higher stigmatic pollen loads and similar or higher seed set. These results suggest an increase of spontaneous selfing rates in the small population, probably favoured by a smaller flower size, which can not only assure reproductive success when pollinators are scarce, but also provide additional potential to adapt to climatic changes. © 2002 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2002, 76, 79–90.