Abstract
Internationally, there has been a paradigm shift in forest resource management from state-based forest management to community-based forest management. This change has also occurred in Indonesia, namely through the social forestry program as outlined in the the Minister Regulation on Social Forestry and the Minister Regulation on Social Forestry in Perhutani Area. Indeed, these Ministerial Regulations already contain the principles of community-based forest management. However, the implementation still leaves problems. This paper will analyze the procedural weaknesses and inaccuracies in the designation of these Ministerial Regulations. The approach used is the statutory approach and comparison with qualitative analysis. The result shows that it is necessary to change the policy model by changing procedures by re-functioning the role of Forest Management Units as an institution that has the authority to manage forest resources in its area. Besides, the Social Forestry program should only be intended for forest communities who have pioneered forest resource management, whether they have joined the Community Joint Forest Management program or not. However, they must reside around forests managed by Perum Perhutani.
Highlights
Under Law Number 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry, the authority to manage forest resources is given to the government
The Social Forestry policy model contained in the Minister Regulation on Social Forestry has been procedurally implemented
It has been proven that various social forestry programs in Indonesia are already running
Summary
Under Law Number 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry, the authority to manage forest resources is given to the government. In this rule, there is a concept forest management, which includes preparation of management plans, utilisation, rehabilitation and reclamation, and protection and nature conservation. There is a concept forest management, which includes preparation of management plans, utilisation, rehabilitation and reclamation, and protection and nature conservation For this reason, the forest management area is required either at the provincial, regency/city or unit level. The KPH carries out forest management based on the Forest Planning Agency's plans under the Perum Perhutani Unit. The position of planning agency is equivalent to that of the Forest Stakeholder Unit. The Forest Stakeholder Unit's main task is to carry out forest
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
