Abstract
In scientific publications, plagiarism is an ethical breach that can lead to article retractions and damage the reputations of scientists. In academia, when students begin their scientific careers and are learning the norms of scientific research, teaching the concepts of plagiarism is critical. However, a lack of clarity exists regarding the nuances of plagiarism and how universities should address instances of plagiarism committed by students. This study was conducted at the University of The Bahamas with students of scientific research methods classes to assess the effectiveness of plagiarism instruction on student attitudes. Over five semesters, a total of 110 students attended a lesson on plagiarism and completed at-home assignments to support the information learned in class. Students were provided questionnaires, which were administered before and after the plagiarism class, to assess their understanding, attitudes, and opinions regarding plagiarism at the University. Following the class, students indicated a greater understanding of plagiarism, more agreement with strict punishments for plagiarism, and less agreement on the acceptability of reusing past assignments. Students also reported a lack of clarity of the University policy on plagiarism. These results suggest that the university would benefit from providing additional learning opportunities pertaining to plagiarism, as well as a revision of the plagiarism policy, which could assist students as they embark on their scientific careers.
Highlights
IntroductionThe presentation of novel ideas that are well researched and clearly communicated is critical
To advance science, the presentation of novel ideas that are well researched and clearly communicated is critical
The second question covered the topic of self-plagiarism and asked whether the students felt that reusing a past writing assignment is acceptable
Summary
The presentation of novel ideas that are well researched and clearly communicated is critical. As the discipline of science grows more competitive and interdisciplinary, identifying and preventing misconduct become increasingly important (Antes et al, 2009; Anderson & Steneck, 2011; Pupovac & Fanelli, 2014). Plagiarism is a violation of the principles of science and a serious example of misconduct in the discipline (Anderson & Steneck, 2011). While the exact definition of plagiarism is not clearly defined (Anderson & Steneck, 2011; Baker-Gardner & Smart, 2017; Bennett, Behrendt & Boothby, 2011; Bouville, 2008; Pincus & Schmelkin, 2003), the generally-accepted definition is “the appropriation of another person's ideas, K.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
