Abstract

Short-term forecasting of estimated maximum magnitude ({widehat{M}}_{max}) is crucial to mitigate risks of induced seismicity during fluid stimulation. Most previous methods require real-time injection data, which are not always available. This study proposes two deep learning (DL) approaches, along with two data-partitioning methods, that rely solely on preceding patterns of seismicity. The first approach forecasts {widehat{M}}_{max} directly using DL; the second incorporates physical constraints by using DL to forecast seismicity rate, which is then used to estimate {widehat{M}}_{max}. These approaches are tested using a hydraulic-fracture monitoring dataset from western Canada. We find that direct DL learns from previous seismicity patterns to provide an accurate forecast, albeit with a time lag that limits its practical utility. The physics-informed approach accurately forecasts changes in seismicity rate, but sometimes under- (or over-) estimates {widehat{M}}_{max}. We propose that significant exceedance of {widehat{M}}_{max} may herald the onset of runaway fault rupture.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call