Abstract

We quantitatively examined the influence of pore fluid pressure and coseismic stress changes on the seismicity rate changes that followed the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake, on the basis of two approaches. One is a numerical calculation of the classic stress metric of ∆CFS, and the other is an inversion analysis of pore fluid pressure fields with earthquake focal mechanism data. The former calculation demonstrated that seismicity rate changes were consistent with the expectation from ∆CFS in 65% of the target region, whereas they were not in the remaining 35% of the region. The latter analysis indicates that seismicity rates increased in the regions where pore fluid pressure before the Kumamoto earthquake sequence was remarkably enhanced above hydrostatic, regardless of values of ΔCFS. This suggests that the increase in pore fluid pressure is one of the important physical mechanisms triggering aftershock generation. We obtained evidence that pore fluid pressure increased around the southern part of the main rupture zone after the mainshock, examining temporal changes in types of focal mechanism data. The average increases in pore fluid pressure were estimated to be 17, 20, and 17 MPa at depths of 5, 10, and 15 km, respectively. These large increases in pore fluid pressure cannot be explained under the undrained condition. The spatial derivative of the pore fluid pressure field in the depth direction implies that fluid supply from greater depths may have controlled increases in seismicity rates that followed the large earthquake.

Highlights

  • Numerous aftershocks often follow large earthquakes in and around the main rupture zone

  • The results indicate that seismicity rate changes at 65% of the target region were consistent with the coseismic stress changes caused by the largest foreshock and the mainshock of the Kumamoto earthquake

  • We investigated the influences of stress and pore fluid pressure on seismicity rate changes that followed the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence, based on the numerical calculation of the coseismic stress change by the mainshock and the largest foreshock, and the inversion analysis of pore fluid pressure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Numerous aftershocks often follow large earthquakes in and around the main rupture zone. (Additional file 1: Figure S1), we can see that coseismic slip became larger in regions with low pore fluid pressure or high strength These results are consistent with previous studies of seismic tomography in and around the source region of the Kumamoto earthquake, where the mainshock occurred in a high velocity and low Poisson’s ratio and Vp/Vs (e.g., Shito et al 2017; Zhao et al 2018). Pmin f at evaluation points of Group 2 We show that non-negligible increases in pore fluid pressure played an important role in triggering seismicity near the main rupture zone where large shear stress was released by the mainshock and the large foreshock (Fig. 5). It would be interesting to consider the effects on seismicity rate changes in the future

Findings
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call