Phase inversion emulsification of paraffin oil/polyethylene wax blend in water: A comparison between mixed monomeric and monomeric/gemini surfactant systems

Abstract

• Natural-based gemini surfactant (GS) reduced water surface tension more than Tween80. • Using GS reduced water phase volume fraction at phase inversion point (f w,inv ). • Change in f w,inv with polyethylene was alike change in phases interfacial tension. • Rheological properties of emulsions highly depended on crystallinity of oil phase. • Higher stability of emulsions was achieved by GS due to their higher zeta potential. Despite the environmental attractiveness of phase inversion emulsification, polyethylene wax-based emulsions are prepared by high-energy emulsification methods. In this research, phase inversion emulsification of paraffin oil/high density polyethylene wax (PEW) blend in water was conducted using mixed surfactants systems. Sorbitan monooleate (Span 80) was used as the oil-soluble surfactant, while either polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) or a synthesized sunflower oil-based gemini surfactant (SF6) was utilized as the water-soluble surfactant. In order to conduct phase inversion emulsification, the 85 °C water phase containing 5 wt% Tween 80 or SF6 was added to the melted oil phase containing 30 to 60 wt% PEW in the blend and 5 wt% Span 80 at 120 °C with the addition rate of 5 mL/min. Phase inversion point was detected by monitoring the dissolution of the emulsion in water during emulsification and proved by electrical conductivity measurements. A lower effectiveness was found for the mixed monomeric surfactant system compared to the gemini surfactant-containing system. For each surfactant system, the trend of change in water phase volume fraction at phase inversion point upon increase in the PEW content in the oil phase was in accordance with the trend of change in the interfacial tension between the water phase and the oil phase. Using the mixed monomeric/gemini surfactant system resulted in emulsions with larger values of absolute zeta potential and drop sizes comparable to their monomeric surfactant-containing counterparts. The absolute zeta potential of the emulsions containing 30, 50, and 60 wt% PEW in the blend was about 70, 54, and 13 mV higher in case of using the mixed monomeric/gemini surfactant system. The gemini surfactant-containing emulsions demonstrated less shear-thinning behavior and the general trend of change in their viscosity and storage modulus with formulation was in agreement with that in the enthalpy of melting of the dried emulsions. Usage of the mixed monomeric/gemini surfactant system led to higher long-term stability of the emulsions, revealed by lower rate of water evaporation from the emulsions. The results of the current study can be applied for preparation of non-polar polyethylene wax-based emulsions using phase inversion emulsification technique. This investigation also opens up the opportunity to use efficient gemini surfactants in low-energy phase inversion emulsification.