Abstract

Geofluid reservoirs located in heterolithic successions (e.g., turbidites) can be affected by vertical and lateral compartmentalization due to interbedded fine-grained facies (i.e., shale, siltstones) and the presence of faults, respectively. A fault can behave as a conduit or barrier to fluid flow depending on its architecture and the individual hydraulic behavior of its components (i.e., fault core, damage zone). The fault core, normally composed by fault rock or smeared clay material, commonly acts as a flow inhibitor across the fault. Fault-related fractures (macro- and microscopic) in the damage zone generally increase the permeability parallel to the fault, except when they are cemented or filled with gouge material. Although macrofractures (which define the fracture porosity) dominate fluid flow, the matrix porosity (including microfractures) begins to have a more important role in fluid flow as the aperture of macrofractures is occluded, particularly at greater depth. This study investigates the variation in matrix permeability in fault zones hosted in heterolithic successions due to fault architecture and stratigraphy of host rock (i.e., sand-rich turbidites). Two key areas of well-exposed, faulted Miocene turbidites located in central and southern Italy were selected. For this study, six separate fault zones of varying offset were chosen. Each impacts heterolithic successions that formed under similar tectonic conditions and burial depths. Across the selected fault zones, an extensive petrophysical analysis was done in the field and laboratory, through air permeameter measurements, thin section, and synchrotron analysis in both host rock, damage zone, and fault core. Results suggest that the amount and distribution of clay layers in a heterolithic sequence affects fluid flow across the fault, regardless of fault offset.

Highlights

  • Heterolithic successions represent important deep-water targets for oil and gas exploration due to their considerable lateral continuity and high sand volume [1, 2]

  • This study investigates the matrix permeability variation in fault zones hosted in heterolithic successions due to fault architecture and stratigraphy of host rock

  • The results of this study indicate that matrix permeability can decrease towards the main fault surface despite the expected increment of microfracture density

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Heterolithic successions (e.g., sand-rich turbidites) represent important deep-water targets for oil and gas exploration due to their considerable lateral continuity and high sand volume [1, 2]. (b) presence of clay within the fault core may contribute to the sealing behavior of the fault (clay smearing process) [14,15,16,17] In these reservoirs, the stratigraphy may exert a primary control on the fracture intensity distribution in both host rock (diffuse deformation) and fault zones (localized deformation) [18,19,20,21,22,23]. The fractures in the damage zone may enhance the fluid flow parallel to the fault if they are opened (e.g., joints, partially cemented joints) and connected They may inhibit the crossflow when closed by secondary mineralization, fault gouge, or deformation banding [13, 29,30,31,32,33]. The permeability associated to fractures within the damage zone may change over time due to the interplay of coseismic fracturing, pressure variation, and sealing/healing [34,35,36,37]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call