Petrology and geochemistry of the Palaeo‐Mesoarchean Banded Iron formations (BIFs) from the central Bundelkhand greenstone belts, Bundelkhand Craton, India: Source characteristics and depositional environment

Abstract

Palaeo‐Mesoarchean Banded Iron formations (BIFs) of central Bundelkhand greenstone belts occur from Babina (in the west) to Mahoba (in the east) via Mauranipur along with the E–W trending of the Bundelkhand Tectonic Zone (BTZ). In the present study, we report petrological, geochemical, and mineralogical data of BIFs from the Babina, Mauranipur, and Mahoba greenstone belts of central Bundelkhand Greenstone Complex to address their source characteristics and deposition environment. The lithological association of BIFs in the Babina and Mauranipur greenstone belts consists of pillowed basic–ultrabasic volcanics and metasediments, whereas in the Mahoba greenstone belt, BIFs and quartzite occur within basic volcanics. These lithological associations collectively suggest that the entire succession was deposited in a marine environment. Based on geological setting, they are classified as Algoma‐type. The main mineral assemblages of the Babina and Mauranipur BIFs are composed of magnetite, quartz, ±garnet, hornblende, chlorite, and apatite, whereas the Mahoba BIFs along with magnetite and quartz, poised of two distinct mineral assemblages; the first one is Opx–Cpx–Grt and the other one is Grt–Hbl. The preliminary P–T study of these BIFs implies that they had gone through amphibolite‐ to granulite‐facies metamorphism. The geochemical characteristics show that BIFs from the Babina and Mauranipur greenstone belts are dominated by higher quartz and magnetite (total content = 90.63–99.95 wt.%), whereas the Mahoba greenstone belt is characterized by lesser quartz and magnetite components (total content = 86.68–94.58 wt.%). The PAAS (Post Archean Average of Australian Sediments)‐normalized REE patterns display significant positive Eu anomaly (Eu/Eu* up to 2.50) with well‐represented negative Ce anomalies (Ce/Ce* = 0.27–1.20). The REE and trace element ratios of BIFs from the Babina and Mauranipur greenstone belts suggest that they were formed by high‐T hydrothermal fluid activity without or very less continental input. Moreover, the Mahoba greenstone belt BIFs are formed by low‐T hydrothermal fluid activity with substantial continental input. Their chemical variation suggests the shallowing of the proto‐basin from the Babina in the west to Mahoba in the east. Tectonic discrimination plots imply the BIFs of the Babina, Mauranipur, and Mahoba greenstone belts of the central Bundelkhand Greenstone Complex are formed in a back‐arc tectonic setting.