Depositional model for banded iron formation host to gold in the Archean Rio das Velhas greenstone belt, Brazil, based on geochemistry and LA-ICP-MS magnetite analyses

Abstract

Petrographic and geochemical data were obtained for selected carbonaceous and siderite-bearing chert and banded iron formation (BIF) from the Archean Rio das Velhas greenstone belt (RVGB), Quadrilátero Ferrífero, including seven orogenic gold deposits (Cuiabá, Lamego, Raposos, Roça Grande, São Bento, Urubu and Ápis) and two barren BIFs (Sumidouro and Campo Grande). The RVGB has Algoma-type BIFs that differ in terms of lithological association, mineralogical assemblage and geochemistry. Trace element geochemistry of the BIFs is used to investigate their depositional environment, and to evaluate if primary geochemical and petrographic features have implications for gold mineralization. The chert layers of the Lamego and Urubu deposits exhibit significant, positive Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu*PAAS = 1.57–4.01) and low contents of immobile elements (Al2O3 = <0.34 wt%, TiO2 = <0.02 wt%), suggesting a high contribution of hydrothermal fluid in their formation, with relatively low detrital input. The carbonate- and the magnetite-rich BIF of the Cuiabá, Roça Grande, Ápis and Raposos deposits display Eu/Eu*PAAS = 1.34–3.25; Al2O3 = 0.04–1.47 wt%, TiO2 = <0.03 wt%, interpreted to represent an intermediate contribution of hydrothermal fluid, as well as limited detrital input. The São Bento, Campo Grande and Sumidouro BIF show a significant mineralogical variability including magnetite, carbonate and iron-rich silicates. Their Eu/Eu*PAAS = 1.1–2.6; Al2O3 = 0.11–6.82 wt%, TiO2 = 0.03–0.33 wt% suggest high detrital input and low hydrothermal fluid influence. Textural relations and mineral assemblages of magnetite-rich samples indicate three main generations of this mineral: (i) diagenetic (very low grade metamorphic), (ii) early and (iii) main-stage hydrothermal. Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) analyses show that Ti, V, Ni and Co contents of magnetite systematically fluctuate. Their concentrations of Ti (50–677 ppm), V (11–207 ppm), Ni (8–166 ppm) and Co (3–14 ppm) in magnetite (i) are the highest comparatively to types (ii) and (iii) (Ti = 7–352 ppm; V = 0.2–59 ppm; Ni = 1–22 ppm; Co = 0.1–7 ppm). Even higher trace element content of the Sumidouro (i) is related to important clastic input to seawater during BIF deposition. The composition of magnetite types (ii) and (iii) is dependent on coexisting minerals (sulfides, carbonates and silicates), and on the type of mechanism of their formation (dissolution-reprecipitation, or re-equilibration). The mineralogical, geochemical and geological diversity of the RVGB BIFs, as well as magnetite composition in BIF, point to a depositional model for the RVGB BIF within the Rio das Velhas basin related to both proximity to the hydrothermal vent and of terrigenous sedimentary input.Deposition of chert layers (e.g., Lamego and Urubu deposits) was favored near the hydrothermal vents on the abyssal plain due to high concentration of silica and organic carbon. Away from the hydrothermal source, chert transitioned to carbonate-rich BIF, typical of Cuiabá, Roça Grande and Ápis, which still formed under the influence of organic matter. Magnetite-rich BIF, i.e. Raposos deposit, was deposited further away from the volcanic center, with limited supply of organic carbon and silica. In a submarine environment with greater clastic input, such as continental shelfs and island arcs, BIF composition was influenced by detrital contamination, and iron-rich silicates (i.e., stilpnomelane and chlorite) are common, besides magnetite and carbonate; this is the case for the São Bento, Campo Grande and Sumidouro BIFs. The BIF types with abundant iron-rich carbonate and-or magnetite host gold mineralization more efficiently since they are especially favorable to sulfides replacement accompanied by gold precipitation.