Abstract
This paper addresses the issue of personal property security law reform. It asks why the reform agenda has been pursued much more vigorously in New Zealand than in England even though the two jurisdictions have had very similar starting points. In addition, the paper looks at the fundamental and difficult policy questions that have to be considered in personal property security law reform and the importance of attention to detail in enacting reform measures. If England is to have successful personal property security law reform, then the paper suggests that some of the precedents set in New Zealand may have to be avoided.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
