Abstract

This paper compares the performance associated with both direct and reverse ball mill closed circuit configurations. Survey campaigns were carried out in both Samarco Mineração industrial plants, i.e., Concentrator I and Concentrator II. The former is equipped with a reverse-configured ball mill closed grinding circuit, while the latter is equipped with ball mills under a direct closed circuit. The study consisted of laboratory jar tests, as well as comparisons between historical data obtained for both industrial plants. Comparisons based on historical data indicated that Concentrator II, configured in a direct mode, exhibited a better performance than that of Concentrator I. Such a conclusion is in contrast with the results obtained from survey campaigns, which indicated a better performance for the reverse configuration. Such a difference was determined by the performance of the classification stage, carried out in cyclones, as demonstrated by simulations conducted on the basis of previously calibrated models.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.