Penyelesaian Dugaan Pelanggaran Kode Etik Oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris Terhadap Notaris Yang Telah Meninggal Dunia

Abstract

In the making of a deed, the Notary must pay attention to the forms and procedures set by the Notary Position Law (Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, UUJN). In practice however, it iss found that there was a Notary reported by a group of people in Ponorogo Regency for their refusal to hand them a copy of the agreement made. The formulation of the problem in this study is how is the legal protection for the applicant and how is the settlement process carried out by the Notary Supervisory Board for losses suffered by the community due to alleged violations of the code of ethics committed by a notary who has died. This is a normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and qualitative case analysis approaches. The results of this study conclude that based on the analysis conducted in the UUJN, sanctions are regulated for notaries who violate the code of ethics. As for legal protection arrangements for parties or communities who feel disadvantaged, there are only a few articles in the UUJN, and even then they are general in nature. The protection obtained by the community or the aggrieved party is repressive protection whose implementation can be seen in Articles 70 and 73 UUJN. If any person is aggrieved by the Notary, they are able to report it to the Regional Supervisory Council