Abstract
All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.● Type of peer review: Double-blind: Evaluated based on originality, technical and research content, relevance to conference, contributions, and readability. The full paper submissions will be chosen based on technical merit, interest, applicability, and how well they fit a coherent and balanced technical program.● Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Accept Submission: The paper is accepted without any future changes. Minor Revision: The paper is in principle accepted after revision based on the reviewer’s comments. Authors are given seven days for minor revisions. Major Revision: The acceptance of the manuscript would depend on the revisions. Usually, only one round of major revisions is allowed. Authors will be asked to resubmit the revised paper within ten days and the revised version will be returned to the reviewer for further comments. Decline: The article has serious flaws, makes no original contribution, and the paper is rejected with no offer of resubmission to the journal.● Conference submission management system: Email and Open Conference Systems - The email address used for submission and the person: ICGESD@163.com (Mike Ming) and oooky@whut.edu.cn (Lin Liu).● Number of submissions received: 412● Number of submissions sent for review: 387● Number of submissions accepted: 279● Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 67.7● Average number of reviews per paper: 2● Total number of reviewers involved: 93● Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): To contribute to the orderly running of this GESD as well as its quality-driven mission by reviewing the manuscripts objectively and timely.To maintain the confidentiality of any information supplied by the editor or author and not retain or copy the manuscript. Reviewers should not use or disseminate any information, arguments, or interpretations contained in an unpublished manuscript, except with the consent of the author.To support the judgment adequately so that editors and authors may understand the basis of their comments.If reviewers become aware of scientific misconduct, fraud, plagiarism or any other unethical behavior related to the manuscript, they should bring those concerns to the Conference Editor immediately.iThenticate will be used for plagiarism check. The amount of duplication from previously published content should be less than 30%; If the amount of duplication is 30% - 50%, modification maybe required; if the amount of duplication exceeds 50%, the article will be rejected. Please note that there will be no refund for no-shows.● Contact person for queries: Lin Liu, Research Center of Engineering and Science, oooky@whut.edu.cn
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call