Abstract

The article explores the complex interplay between parliamentary oversight, legislative initiatives, and societal conditions through the lens of semantic networks and paradoxes. The application of generative artificial intelligence technologies enabled the reconstruction of legislative texts, uncovering hidden contradictions and paradoxes that influence decision-making, including the retroactivity of laws, causality from the future, revisionism of past decisions, and legislative dynamics. The article examines the temporal paradoxes that arise in the process of parliamentary oversight and legislative activity. It analyzes how associative connections, mistakenly perceived as causal, lead to distortions in the chronology of events and decision-making. Special attention is given to paradoxes such as the retroactivity of laws and the revision of political decisions, which complicate the prediction of future outcomes of parliamentary initiatives.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.