Abstract

Simple SummaryOvarian cancer treatment is the deadliest of gynecological cancers but the introduction of target therapies in its therapeutic algorithm has significantly improved outcomes. The aim of this article was to provide a review of completed and ongoing clinical trials involving the use of PARP inhibitors and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer in front line and relapse settings. We confirmed the role of bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors which have transformed OC into a chronic disease while almost all trials involving immunotherapy were disappointing. Ovarian cancer treatment strategy is mainly based on three pillars: cytoreductive surgery, platinum-based chemotherapy, and targeted therapies. The latter in the last decade has provided a remarkable improvement in progression free patients and, hopefully, in overall survival. In particular, poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors exploit BRCA 1/2 mutations and DNA damage response deficiencies, which are believed to concern up to 50% of high grade epithelial ovarian cancer cases. While these agents have an established role in ovarian cancer treatment strategy in BRCA mutated and homologous recombination deficient patients, an appropriate predictive molecular test to select patients is lacking in clinical practice. At the same time, the impressive results of immunotherapy in other malignancies, have opened the space for the introduction of immune-stimulatory drugs in ovarian cancer. Despite immune checkpoint inhibitors as a monotherapy bringing only modest efficacy when assessed in pretreated ovarian cancer patients, the combination with chemotherapy, anti-angiogenetics, PARP inhibitors, and radiotherapy is believed to warrant further investigation. We reviewed literature evidence on PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy in ovarian cancer treatment.

Highlights

  • Ovarian cancer (OC) treatment strategy has dramatically changed over the last decade

  • We reviewed the state of the art and the most relevant perspectives of targeted therapies in OC, focusing on poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and immune check point inhibitors

  • No mature overall survival (OS) data are available, while quality of life did not report any difference between the two treatment arms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ovarian cancer (OC) treatment strategy has dramatically changed over the last decade. Several considerations should be taken into account when choosing first line and second line treatments: patients and disease characteristics may play a role in determining the choice. As far as bevacizumab is concerned, there is no unanimous agreement on its prescription in clinical practice in front-line maintenance treatment, given the absence of validated predictive molecular biomarkers of response, the lack of evidence of OS advantage in the overall population and in low risk patients in particular, and the better hazard ratio (HR) reported in the second line settings [5]. We reviewed the state of the art and the most relevant perspectives of targeted therapies in OC, focusing on PARP inhibitors and immune check point inhibitors

State of the Art Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer
RRoollee of Parp Inhibitor in First Line Treatment
Olaparib and Bevacizumab Combination
Niraparib
Bevacizumab
Role of Parp Inhibitors in Relapse Disease
Rucaparib
Role of Immune Check Point Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer Treatment
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call