Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are the first clinically approved drugs designed to exploit synthetic lethality, and were first introduced as a cancer-targeting strategy in 2005. They have led to a major change in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, and altered the natural history of a disease with extreme genetic complexity and defective DNA repair via homologous recombination (HR) pathway. Furthermore, additional mechanisms apart from breast related cancer antigens 1 and 2 (BRCA1/2) mutations can also result in HR pathway alterations and consequently lead to a clinical benefit from PARP inhibitors. Novel combinations of PARP inhibitors with other anticancer therapies are challenging, and better understanding of PARP biology, DNA repair mechanisms, and PARP inhibitor mechanisms of action is crucial. It seems that PARP inhibitor and biologic agent combinations appear well tolerated and clinically effective in both BRCA-mutated and wild-type cancers. They target differing aberrant and exploitable pathways in ovarian cancer, and may induce greater DNA damage and HR deficiency. The input of immunotherapy in ovarian cancer is based on the observation that immunosuppressive microenvironments can affect tumour growth, metastasis, and even treatment resistance. Several biologic agents have been studied in combination with PARP inhibitors, including inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; bevacizumab, cediranib), and PD-1 or PD-L1 (durvalumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab), anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibodies (tremelimumab), mTOR-(vistusertib), AKT-(capivasertib), and PI3K inhibitors (buparlisib, alpelisib), as well as MEK 1/2, and WEE1 inhibitors (selumetinib and adavosertib, respectively). Olaparib and veliparib have also been combined with chemotherapy with the rationale of disrupting base excision repair via PARP inhibition. Olaparib has been investigated with carboplatin and paclitaxel, whereas veliparib has been tested additionally in combination with temozolomide vs. pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, as well as with oral cyclophosphamide, and topoisomerase inhibitors. However, overlapping myelosuppression observed with PARP inhibitor and chemotherapy combinations requires further investigation with dose escalation studies. In this review, we discuss multiple clinical trials that are underway examining the antitumor activity of such combination strategies.
Highlights
The striking sensitivity of breast related cancer antigens 1 and 2 (BRCA1/2) deficient tumour cells to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition have been demonstrated in 2005
All PARP inhibitors developed in epithelial ovarian cancers are PARP1/2 inhibitors, while olaparib and rucaparib inhibit PARP3
An assay using a loss of heterozygosity to identify genomic scarring may be useful to predict PARP inhibitor response in BRCA1/2 wild type ovarian cancers
Summary
The striking sensitivity of breast related cancer antigens 1 and 2 (BRCA1/2) deficient tumour cells to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase PARP inhibition have been demonstrated in 2005. An assay using a loss of heterozygosity to identify genomic scarring may be useful to predict PARP inhibitor response in BRCA1/2 wild type ovarian cancers. Overall, it is not definitely established whether the promising results of preclinical studies will translate into improved clinical activity. This review will focus on the available evidence for PARP inhibitors combined separately with several agents, including anti-angiogenics, immune checkpoint inhibitors, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase B (AKT), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), WEE1, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK), and cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, as well as the traditional chemotherapy in the ovarian cancer. We discuss ongoing clinical trials in this rapidly evolving area
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have