Abstract

Recent art has turned to judiciary and extra-judiciary practices, specifically in the context of international conflicts, in order to assert art’s political accountability and relevance to our capacity to historicise the present. The war in Iraq inspired works that directly address issues of representation and remediation, such as Marc Quinn’s Mirage (2008), in which the aesthetic experience opens onto an ambiguous experience of the breakdown of justice. Other works have chosen to turn carceral space itself into the site of a collective remembering that harnesses affect to a critical reflection on the administration of justice, on assent and dissent. This article will turn to key works by Marc Quinn and Trevor Paglen that confront extra-judiciary malpractices, but also to recent collective art projects involving an interdisciplinary take on the experience of imprisonment, such as Inside. Artists and Writers in Reading Prison (2016), in which artists of all backgrounds responded to Oscar Wilde’s De Profundis on the very premises of Wilde’s incarceration, as well as the work of 2019 Turner Prize co-recipient: Jordanian sound artist Lawrence Abu Hamdan whose recent works rely on testimonies from Syrian detainees and probe the political pragmatics of aural art. All these works have turned to the document—literary, visual, aural—to reflect on the process of experiential mediation. How does the experience of imprisonment, or extra-judiciary malpractices, come to the spectator? How are they read, heard, interpreted, remediated? The article ponders the remediation and displacement of aesthetic experience itself and the “response-ability”—following Donna Haraway’s coinage—of such a repoliticised embodied experience. It will assess the way by which such interdisciplinary works rethink the poetics of the documentary for an embodied intellection of justice—and injustice—in the present.

Highlights

  • Criticism in the past twenty years has explored the repoliticising of contemporary art and its renewed sense of accountability in the face of a global sense of crisis, fuelled by protracted international conflicts, as well as economic and environmental crises

  • According to Kester, in order to meet that challenge, activist art had to strike a fine balance between aesthetics and political action, in order to retain its specific mode of interacting with the present: A traditional, formalist critical approach is premised on a clear separation between the realm of the artwork and the realm of political decision making, and between the artist as a private, expressive subject and the domain of social exchange and collective will-formation

  • At the same time activist artists and critics are confronted by the need to preserve the specificity of activist art, as a practice that is discrete from other forms of political activism. (n.p.)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Criticism in the past twenty years has explored the repoliticising of contemporary art and its renewed sense of accountability in the face of a global sense of crisis, fuelled by protracted international conflicts, as well as economic and environmental crises. At the same time activist artists and critics are confronted by the need to preserve the specificity of activist art, as a practice that is discrete from other forms of political activism.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call