Abstract
To address the challenges of verifying MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) in PET/MR due to CT positional mismatches and alignment issues, this study utilized a flatbed insert and arms-down positioning during PET/CT scans to achieve precise MR-CT matching for accurate MRAC evaluation. A validation dataset of 21 patients underwent whole-body [18F]FDG PET/CT followed by [18F]FDG PET/MR. A flatbed insert ensured consistent positioning, allowing direct comparison of four MRAC methods-four-tissue and five-tissue models with discrete and continuous μ-maps-against CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC). A deep learning-based framework, trained on a dataset of 300 patients, was used to generate synthesized-CTs from MR images, forming the basis for all MRAC methods. Quantitative analyses were conducted at the whole-body, region of interest, and lesion levels, with lesion-distance analysis evaluating the impact of bone proximity on standardized uptake value (SUV) quantification. Distinct differences were observed among MRAC methods in spine and femur regions. Joint histogram analysis showed MRAC-4 (continuous μ-map) closely aligned with CTAC. Lesion-distance analysis revealed MRAC-4 minimized bone-induced SUV interference (r = 0.01, p = 0.8643). However, tissues prone to bone segmentation interference, such as the spine and liver, exhibited greater SUV variability and lower reproducibility in MRAC-4 compared to MRAC-2 (2D bone segmentation, discrete μ-map) and MRAC-3 (3D bone segmentation, discrete μ-map). Using a flatbed insert, this study validated MRAC with high precision. Continuous μ-value MRAC method (MRAC-4) demonstrated superior accuracy and minimized bone-related SUV errors but faced challenges in reproducibility, particularly in bone-rich regions.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call