Abstract

ABSTRACT Design processes nowadays rely more and more on automated optimisation methods to shorten the development cycle. Within those optimisation methods, gradient-free ones converge slower but rather to a global optimum, while gradient-based methods converge faster to a local optimum. Quite recently gradient-free methods have been assisted by metamodels to improve their convergence and gradient-based methods are making use of adjoints to speed up the gradient evaluation. In this article, we compare an adjoint-assisted gradient-based and a metamodel-assisted gradient-free method with respect to convergence, local/global optima and especially the computational time. On a constrained multipoint aerodynamic optimisation of a turbine inlet vane, gradient-based and gradient-free methods reached 22% and 24%, respectively, of total pressure loss reduction. The metamodel-assisted method reached a 2% higher objective value at double the cost of flow evaluations, an additional cost related mainly to the evaluation of an initial database.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.