Abstract

In a carbon-constrained world, natural gas with low emission intensity plays an important role in the energy consumption area. Energy consumers and distribution networks are linked via energy hubs. Meanwhile, reconfiguration that optimizes operational performance while maintaining a radial network topology is a worldwide technique in the electricity distribution system. To improve the overall efficiency of energy infrastructure, the expansion of electricity distribution lines and elements within energy hubs should be co-planned. In this paper, the co-planning process is modeled as a mixed integer quadratic programming problem to handle conflicting objectives simultaneously. We propose a novel model to identify the optimal co-expansion plan in terms of total cost. Operational factors including energy storages and reconfiguration are considered within the systems to serve electricity, cooling and heating loads. Reconfiguration and elements in energy hubs can avoid or defer new elements’ installation to minimize the investment cost, maintenance cost, operation cost, and interruption cost in the planning horizon. The proposed co-planning approach is verified on 3 and 12-node electricity and natural gas distribution systems coupled via energy hubs. Numerical results show the ability of our proposed expansion co-planning approach based on energy hub in meeting energy demand.

Highlights

  • With the introduction of various emission reduction schemes in recent years, the share of natural gas consumption has been ascending all around the world

  • The optimal expansion co-planning of natural gas and electricity distribution systems is a new challenge and will require reinforce the existing energy infrastructures or add additional elements

  • To address the challenges of: (1) identifying the optimal allocation of energy hubs in coupled electricity and natural gas distribution systems to enhance economy and reliability; (2) quantifying the impact of energy storage and electricity network reconfiguration at operational level; (3) reducing computational burden, a clear need emerges for the development of a model with linearize constraints architecture

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the introduction of various emission reduction schemes in recent years, the share of natural gas consumption has been ascending all around the world. To address the challenges of: (1) identifying the optimal allocation of energy hubs in coupled electricity and natural gas distribution systems to enhance economy and reliability; (2) quantifying the impact of energy storage and electricity network reconfiguration at operational level; (3) reducing computational burden, a clear need emerges for the development of a model with linearize constraints architecture. The model is mixed integer quadratic programming (MIQP), which can leads to a faster solution process and globally optimal results This is especially valuable as integrated decisions can be made to provide a valuable guide for both systems’ planning activities and directly benefit total costs made by multiple energy distribution systems.

Energy Hub and Whole Model
Matrix Modeling of Energy Hub
Matrix Scheme of Whole Model
Objective Function
Construction Logical Constraints
Energy Hubs Constraints
Energy Storages Constraints
Natural Gas Distribution Network Constraints
Bilinear Relaxation and Whole Model hsy
Numerical Results
Common Assumptions
Systems with Three Energy Hubs
Systems with Twelve
Conclusions and Future Work
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call