Abstract

We consider the online learning problem for binary relations defined over two finite sets, each clustered into a relatively small number k,l of types (such a relation is termed a ( k,l)-binary relation), extending the models of S. Goldman, R. Rivest, and R. Schapire (1993, SIAM J. Comput. 22, 1006–1034). We investigate the learning complexity of ( k,l)-binary relations with respect to both the self-directed and adversary-directed learning models. We also generalize this problem to the learning problem for ( k 1,…, k d )- d-ary relations. In the self-directed model, we exhibit an efficient learning algorithm which makes at most kl+( n− k)log k+( m− l)log l mistakes, where n and m are the number of rows and columns, roughly twice the lower bound we show for this problem, 1 4 ⌊log k⌋⌊log l⌋+ 1 2 ( n− k) ⌊log k⌋+ 1 2 ( m− l) ⌊log l⌋. In the adversary-directed model, we exhibit an efficient algorithm for the (2,2)-binary relations, which makes at most n+ m+2 mistakes, only two more than the lower bound we show for this problem, n+ m. As for ( k 1,…, k d )- d-ary relations, we obtain lower bounds and upper bounds on the number of mistakes in the self-directed model, teacher-directed model, and adversary-directed model. Finally we show that, although the sample consistency problem for (2,2)-binary relations is solvable in polynomial time, the same problem for (2,2,2)-ternary relations is already NP-complete.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.