Abstract
R.A. Sorensen, in his invited paper on nuclear moments at the Asilomar Conference, stated that ‘in the continuing contest of experimentalist versus theorist, the experimentalist seems to be in the lead’. After three years this statement seems to be even more justified as the number of experimental data on nuclear magnetic moments and their accuracy have increased, while the theory of magnetic moments is still not capable of predicting moments better than a few tenths of the nuclear magneton. Not one of the main problems in the theory of nuclear magnetic moments has reached a decisive solution, although a constant development in their understanding is observed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
