Abstract
Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity requires systems of clock-synchronised stationary observers and the Lorentz Transformation. Without both, the Theory of Relativity fails. A system of clock-synchronised stationary observers is proven inconsistent with the Lorentz Transformation, because it is Galilean. The Special Theory of Relativity insists that Galilean systems must transform not by the Galilean Transformation, but by the non-Galilean Lorentz Transformation. The Theory of Relativity is therefore invalid due to an intrinsic logical contradiction.
Highlights
It has recently been proven by Engelhardt [1] thatEinstein’s method of synchronising clocks in his SpecialTheory of Relativity is inconsistent with the LorentzTransformation
This inconsistency is due to an inherent logical contradiction in Special Relativity, because
Einstein incorrectly assumed that systems of clocksynchronised stationary observers are consistent with the Lorentz Transformation
Summary
The clocks are all at rest relative to the CS They are ‘good’ clocks and are synchronised, which means that they show the same time simultaneously.” [2 §3]. A rigid body which, measured in a state of rest, has the form of a sphere, has in a state of motion - viewed from the stationary system - the form of an ellipsoid of revolution with the axes. “ with the help of certain imaginary physical experiments we have settled what is to be understood by synchronous stationary clocks located at different places, and have obtained a definition of ‘simultaneous’, or Stephen John Crothers: On the Logical Inconsistency of the Special Theory of Relativity ‘synchronous’, and of ‘time’.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
