Abstract
Response to an earlier article surveying the debate between Soviet advocates of uniform versus pronatalist measures in the years preceding the 26th Party Congress of the Soviet Union in 1981. Argues that the misuse of the term regionally differentiated by the authors robbed it of any meaning and charges that they further ignored the experimental efforts in eastern Europe to deal with very similar policy concerns. The author concludes that the new measures introduced at the Congress are not qualitatively unique reflect continuation of a practice well established in the Soviet Union and are the opposite of that suggested in the earlier article.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
