Abstract

Offshore oil and gas operations carry a high risk of explosions, which can be efficiently prevented in many cases. The two most used approaches for prevention are: (1) the “International Electrotechnical Commission System for Certification to Standards Relating to Equipment for Use in Explosive Atmospheres” (IECEx) and (2) European “Atmosphere Explosible” (ATEX) schemes. The main shortcoming for the IECEx scheme is in the fact that it does not cover nonelectrical equipment, while for the ATEX scheme, it is due to the allowed self-certification for a certain category of equipment in areas with a low probability of explosions, as well as the fact that it explicitly excludes mobile offshore drilling units from its scope. An advantage of the IECEx scheme is that it is prescribed by the US Coast Guard for protection against explosions on foreign mobile offshore drilling units, which intend to work on the US continental shelf but have never operated there before, with an additional requirement that the certificates should be obtained through a US-based Certified Body (ExCB). Therefore, to avoid bureaucratic obstacles and to be allowed to operate with minimized additional costs both in the US and the EU/EEA’s offshore jurisdictions (and very possibly worldwide), all mobile offshore drilling units should be certified preferably as required by the US Coast Guard.

Highlights

  • The offshore oil and gas industry involves many risks of explosions for personnel and installations

  • Both the ATmosphere EXplosible” (ATEX) and IECEx schemes provide a high level of protection against explosions but with some differences that are described in this note [6,7]

  • The principles for the classification of equipment proofed for use in areas with a higher risk of explosions are similar in most countries, and they are based on requirements introduced by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) [8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The offshore oil and gas industry involves many risks of explosions for personnel and installations. The EU/EEA and the USA require different levels of protection against explosions for oil and gas mobile offshore drilling units compared with their related requirements imposed for fixed offshore platforms and offshore (Table 1). Both the ATEX and IECEx schemes provide a high level of protection against explosions but with some differences that are described in this note [6,7]. Foreign mobile units (including equipment onboard) on the US continental shelf 3

Main Certification Schemes for Protection against Explosions
Other Main Certification Schemes for Protection against Explosions
Canada
Eurasian Union
Brazil
Australia and New Zealand
Differences between the ATEX and IECEx Certification Schemes
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call