Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical outcome of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and PPH + selective Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy(MMH) in surgical treatment of Ⅲ ~ Ⅳ stage hemorrhoids and research the best surgical procedures.Methods Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 125 cases with Ⅲ ~ Ⅳ stage mixed hemorrhoids,they were non-randomized-controlled divided into PPH group (group 1) and PPH + selective MMH group(group 2),comparing the data of recurrence,complication and symptoms relief including anal prolapse,bleeding,anus fall feeling,wet anus and pruritus ani.Results While observing 3 years after operation,group 1 and group 2 both relieved symptoms of anal prolapse,bleeding,anus fall feeling,wet anus and pruritus ani.The relief rate of these symptoms in the two group were all high than 92%.There was one cases relapsed in the group 2 (the recurrence rate of 2%) was better than the group 1 (the recurrence rate of 13%) which were 8 case,there was a significant statistical significance (x2 =4.629,P < 0.05) in the recurrence and clinical outcome.Conclusion Radical choose of PPH and selective MMH to treat Ⅲ ~ Ⅳ stage mixed hemorrhoids patients,which could relieve postoperative symptoms and acquire better long-term clinic outcomes. Key words: Hemorrhoids; Circumferential mixed hemorrhoids; Procedure for Prolapse and hemorrhoids; Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have