Abstract
In two experiments, we tested the hypothesis that some portion of the literal meaning of ironic remarks is processed automatically, along with the intended meaning. In experiment 1, subjects took longer to judge the evaluative tone (positive or negative) of utterances used ironically than used literally, demonstrating that the literal meaning of the ironic utterances was accessed, and interfered with the nonliteral meaning judgment. In experiment 2, subjects took longer to judge the evaluative tone of the literal meaning of utterances used ironically than used literally, demonstrating that the nonliteral meaning of the ironic utterances was accessed, and interfered with the literal meaning judgment. These results support a multiple meaning model of irony processing in which both literal and nonliteral meanings are obligatorily processed. Results are also consistent with social-functional studies of irony demonstrating that the evaluative tone of the literal meaning of irony serves to mute the perceived tone of the intended, nonliteral meaning (Dews and Winner, 1995).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
