Abstract

A comparison is made of solutions of the continuity equations for the motion of electrons and ions in a strong electric field using the methods of Euler, Runge-Kutta, Lax-Wendroff, characteristics and the flux-corrected transport (FCT) algorithm “Phoenical LPE Shasta” developed by Boris and Book( J. Comput. Phys. 20 (1976) , 397), with their flux limiter and with the new flux limiting algorithms developed by Zalesak ( J. Comput. Phys. 31 (1979) , 335). Results with and without ionization, and for uniform and non-uniform electric fields, are compared. Because ionization by electrons is strongly dependent on the electric field, considerable care needs to be taken to choose an optimum numerical scheme for non-uniform fields. For example, the calculation of the properties of corona discharges, or the cathode-fall of a glow discharge, requires fine spatial resolution. It is found that the Lax-Wendroff method and the method of characteristics give acceptable results; however, the Phoenical LPE Shasta algorithm with the flux limiting algorithm of Zalesak gives the best results, with the added advantage of suppressing spurious oscillations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.