Abstract

The electrohydrodynamic flow associated with a fluid drop in an electric field is a consequence of the tangential electric stress at the fluid interface. The tangential viscous stress due to the electrohydrodynamic flow arises to just balance the tangential electric stress at the fluid interface so that the traction boundary condition is satisfied. Influenced by both the local electric stress and viscous stress, the drop interface may exhibit various shapes. The presence of fluid flow also leads to charge convection phenomena. The relative significance of the charge convection effect is usually measured in terms of the electric Reynolds number, Re E , defined as the ratio of the timescales of charge convection by flow and that for charge relaxation by ohmic conduction. This work presents a quantitative analysis of the charge convection effects in a framework of the leaky dielectric model at finite Re E , which has not been considered in previous investigations. Axisymmetric steady flows driven by an applied uniform electric field about a deformable fluid drop suspended in an immiscible fluid are studied by computational means of the Galerkin finite–element method with supplementary asymptotic analysis. The results of finite–element computations are in general agreement with the prediction by the asymptotic analysis for spherical drops at vanishingly small Re E . A common effect of charge convection is found to reduce the intensity of electrohydrodynamic flow. As a consequence, oblate drops are predicted to be less deformed in an electric field when charge convection is taken into account. The prolate drops are often associated with an equator–to–pole flow, which convects charges toward the poles to form a charge distribution resembling that in a highly conducting drop immersed in an insulating medium. Therefore, charge convection tends to enhance the prolate drop deformation. In many cases, charge convection effects are found to be significant even at apparently small Re E , corresponding to the charge relaxation time–scale about 10 −3 s, suggesting that many experimental results reported in the previous publications could have been influenced by charge convection effects.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.