Abstract

Thomas Bayes (1702-1761) has had a big influence on the science of inference since he discovered the mathematically correct way of adjusting probabilities to account for new evidence. Nonetheless, it is still the case that in practice it is not always clear where and when to apply the rule he derived, or the consequences of not doing so. In this note, the effects of not doing so when searching an area of ground for a missing person (misper), where the chances of finding them depends both on whether they are there and how well the ground is searched, is investigated. This investigation suggests that within the range of probabilities that generally apply to search operations in rural settings in the UK, the widespread failure to apply Bayes’ rule may incline search managers to widen search areas more than is warranted by the evidence and may thereby reduce overall search effectiveness (ceteris paribus).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call